Business planning perspective888-464-8341
Business Life Insurance

Section 412(e)(3) Plans

412(e)(3) Plans for High-Income Business Owners: Benefit Limits, Contributions and How the Strategy Works

Published October 9, 2026 · Updated October 9, 2026

Short Answer: What a 412(e)(3) Plan Means for a High-Income Business Owner

For a high-income business owner, a 412(e)(3) plan is a fully insured defined-benefit plan: the business promises a set retirement benefit and funds it only with individual insurance and annuity contracts that meet strict federal conditions. The benefit it may promise is capped by a federal annual limit, and the business may deduct contributions only within federal deduction limits.

This page is for owners, partners and shareholder-employees whose pay is high enough that federal ceilings, not their own compensation, define the plan. It explains what those ceilings mean at high pay, how the contracts fund the benefit, and where the compliance risk sits. Before the Pension Protection Act of 2006, these arrangements were known as "412(i) plans," according to the IRS page on fully insured 412(e)(3) plans.

Why Benefit and Compensation Limits Matter More at High Pay

High pay changes which rule does the limiting. Section 415(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that a defined-benefit plan's annual benefit may not be "greater than the lesser of— (A) $160,000, or (B) 100 percent of the participant's average compensation for his high 3 years." Section 415(d) requires the Secretary of the Treasury to adjust the dollar amount annually for cost-of-living increases.

Notice 2025-67 states that, effective January 1, 2026, the section 415(b)(1)(A) limit "is increased from $280,000 to $290,000." For a lower-paid participant, the 100-percent-of-compensation test usually binds first. For an owner whose high-three average pay exceeds $290,000, the 2026 dollar limit becomes the ceiling, whatever the actual earnings.

A separate Code limit also caps the compensation a qualified plan may take into account, and it too is indexed annually. At high pay, a benefit formula therefore runs on capped pay, not actual pay. Because the plan promises a benefit near the ceiling, the contribution needed to fund it can be large, especially when few years remain before retirement. That funding size is the feature high-income owners most often evaluate.

Typical Business Structure for a 412(e)(3) Plan

Sponsorship belongs to the business, not to the owner personally. The plan is maintained by the employer, and its trust qualifies under section 401(a), which describes a trust forming part of a pension plan "of an employer for the exclusive benefit of his employees or their beneficiaries."

Self-employed owners are not shut out. Section 401(c)(1)(A) provides that "employee" includes a self-employed individual. Section 401(c)(3) defines an "owner-employee" as including an employee who "owns the entire interest in an unincorporated trade or business." A sole proprietor's plan benefit is measured against "earned income," which section 401(c)(2) defines by reference to net earnings from self-employment, determined with regard to the section 404 deductions.

Closely held corporations and professional practices organized as professional corporations or partnerships are common sponsors. In such businesses, the owner is often the main participant, so the owner's age and the section 415(b) ceiling largely set the contribution. Professional-licensing and ownership rules for medical, dental, legal and accounting practices vary by state. Fit for owner-only plans and businesses with staff is treated on the site's page on section 412(e)(3) plans.

The Specific Planning Trigger: High Income and a Short Funding Window

The trigger is a combination of high, stable earnings and a limited number of years before a target retirement date. A defined-benefit plan funds a promised benefit by normal retirement age. With fewer years left, each year's funding share is larger, which is why older, high-income owners see the largest contributions.

In a 412(e)(3) plan, those contributions buy insurance contracts. Section 412(e)(3)(B) requires the contracts to provide "for level annual premium payments to be paid extending not later than the retirement age" for each participant, starting when the individual became a participant or when a benefit increase took effect. A compressed window therefore means large, fixed annual premiums.

The IRS has also acted against abusive designs. It issued guidance in 2004 and 2005 "to stop abuses involving the use of certain specially designed life insurance policies in retirement plans," citing Rev. Rul. 2004-20, Rev. Rul. 2004-21 and Rev. Proc. 2005-25, according to the IRS page on fully insured 412(e)(3) plans. Plan design, contributions and deductions for a 412(e)(3) plan need individual review of the plan and contracts by the insurers involved and a qualified tax professional.

How a 412(e)(3) Plan Works for a High-Income Owner-Employee

Mechanically, the business contributes to the plan, and the plan uses those contributions to pay premiums on contracts covering the participant. Treasury Regulation § 1.412(i)-1(b)(2)(i) says the purchase "may be made either directly by the employer or through the use of a custodial account or trust."

Section 412(e)(3) lists six conditions. A plan is described there if:

  • (A) "the plan is funded exclusively by the purchase of individual insurance contracts";
  • (B) the contracts provide for level annual premiums, as described in the trigger discussion;
  • (C) plan benefits "are equal to the benefits provided under each contract at normal retirement age" and are backed, as a contract feature, by a state-licensed insurance carrier "to the extent premiums have been paid";
  • (D) premiums for the plan year and all prior years "have been paid before lapse or there is reinstatement of the policy";
  • (E) "no rights under such contracts have been subject to a security interest at any time during the plan year"; and
  • (F) "no policy loans are outstanding at any time during the plan year."

A plan meeting these conditions is exempt from the minimum funding rules of section 412 under section 412(e)(2)(B). The full walk-through is on the site's page on how a 412(e)(3) plan works.

On deductions, section 264(a)(1) provides that no deduction is allowed for "premiums on any life insurance policy, or endowment or annuity contract, if the taxpayer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary." An employer's plan contributions are instead addressed by section 404(a), which provides that pension plan contributions are deductible "under this section," subject to its limits; how these provisions interact for a given plan falls within the individual review of plan design. On death benefits, section 101(a)(1) generally excludes life insurance proceeds paid by reason of death from gross income, subject to the transfer-for-value rule of section 101(a)(2) and, for employer-owned contracts, section 101(j).

Ownership Structure: The Plan Trust, the Employer and the Insured Owner

Four roles sit in the arrangement. The business is the plan sponsor and makes contributions. The plan, directly or through a trust or custodial account, holds the contracts and pays the premiums. The owner-employee is both the insured and the plan participant. The plan's benefit, funded by the contracts, is paid to the participant or, on death, as the plan provides.

Because the owner does not personally own the contracts while they sit in the plan, the owner's rights run through the plan's terms. The IRS page on fully insured plans notes that, where a plan holds life insurance, the amount reported as income "is equivalent to the premium paid on a term life insurance policy for 1 year for the face value of the plan policy."

At retirement, a plan may distribute a contract to the participant or use its value to provide the annuity benefit; either path has tax consequences that turn on the plan's terms and the participant's elections. A distributed contract also raises the question whether the transfer-for-value rule of section 101(a)(2) applies. Section 101(a)(2)(B) excepts a transfer "to the insured," among others. Whether a plan-held contract is an employer-owned contract under section 101(j) depends on the definition and facts of the plan.

Coverage and Funding Considerations at High Income Levels

Funding begins with the benefit, not the policy. An actuary determines the contribution needed to fund the promised benefit by normal retirement age, and the promised benefit may not exceed the section 415(b) limit: $290,000 for 2026 under Notice 2025-67, or 100 percent of high-three average compensation if lower.

Section 404(a)(1)(A) provides that, for a defined-benefit plan other than a multiemployer plan, the deductible amount is "an amount determined under subsection (o)." The site's page on 412(e)(3) plan tax deductions covers that limit.

The insurance face amount is a funding choice inside the plan, sized to the plan's benefit obligations. Rev. Rul. 2004-20 states that employer contributions "used to purchase life insurance coverage for a participant in excess of the participant's death benefit provided under the plan are not fully deductible when contributed," but are carried over to later years within section 404 limits. Insurer forms, procedures, charges and timing vary from insurer to insurer and are confirmed with the insurers involved.

Where the business has other employees, section 401(a)(4) requires that contributions or benefits "do not discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees."

We're Here for You

We're your trusted California business life insurance advisor. Call us 7 days a week, or send us a message, to have a real conversation about what your business needs.

Who This Strategy Is For

This page describes owners for whom a fully insured defined-benefit plan is commonly evaluated:

  • Owner-employees, partners, S corporation shareholder-employees and professional corporation shareholders whose compensation exceeds the Code's indexed compensation limit.
  • Owners with a limited number of years before a target retirement date, which raises the annual funding needed.
  • Businesses with steady cash flow, because section 412(e)(3)(B) fixes level annual premiums.
  • Owners already contributing to a defined-contribution plan who are looking at what a defined-benefit ceiling would allow.

When a 412(e)(3) Plan May Fit a High-Income Owner's Situation

Fit is usually discussed when several facts line up. Earnings stay well above the levels where the section 415(b) percentage test would bind, so the 2026 dollar limit of $290,000 sets the benefit ceiling. The owner's age means funding a benefit near that ceiling requires a large annual contribution relative to other plan types.

The business has few non-owner employees, so the cost of meeting section 401(a)(4) nondiscrimination requirements is limited. Cash flow is steady enough to pay level premiums each year until retirement age. The owner's horizon is long enough for the contracts to run as designed, since the plan is structured around premiums paid through retirement age rather than a short-term arrangement.

When a 412(e)(3) Plan May Not Fit

Variable revenue is the most common mismatch. Level premiums under section 412(e)(3)(B) do not adjust to a weak year, and section 412(e)(3)(D) requires that premiums be paid before lapse or that the policy be reinstated.

A larger workforce can shift the economics, because section 401(a)(4) bars discrimination in favor of highly compensated employees. A younger owner with many years to retirement faces lower annual funding needs, which narrows the gap between this plan and other types.

Design flaws carry their own exposure. A plan that fails any condition in section 412(e)(3)(A)-(F) is no longer described there and loses the exemption in section 412(e)(2)(B). Rev. Rul. 2004-20 also gives an example in which a plan "cannot be a section 412(i) plan" because its contracts provide benefits at normal retirement age above the plan's benefits.

Potential Advantages of a Fully Insured Defined-Benefit Plan at High Income

Several structural features draw attention at high pay. A defined-benefit ceiling of $290,000 a year for 2026, under Notice 2025-67, can support larger funding than a defined-contribution plan, whose 2026 limit is $72,000 according to the IRS COLA table.

Section 501(a) provides that an organization described in section 401(a) "shall be exempt from taxation," so a qualified plan trust is generally not taxed on its earnings.

The contract structure itself is a feature. Section 412(e)(3)(C) requires benefits to be backed by a licensed insurance carrier "to the extent premiums have been paid," a contract feature resting on the insurer's obligation, not a promise to the reader. Exemption from minimum funding rules under section 412(e)(2)(B) replaces actuarial funding swings with a premium schedule. On reporting, 29 C.F.R. § 2520.104-44(b)(2) describes pension plans whose benefits are provided "exclusively through allocated insurance contracts" under which an insurer is obligated for the full benefit payments; such plans are exempt from certain Form 5500 financial items and audit requirements, though the section "does not exempt any plan from filing an annual report form." The site's page on 412(e)(3) advantages and disadvantages weighs the trade-offs.

Important Considerations and Compliance Points

Listed-transaction status is the central compliance point. The IRS page on fully insured plans states: "If the employer deducts amounts used to pay premiums on a life insurance contract with a death benefit that exceeds the participant's death benefit under the plan by more than $100,000, the arrangement is a 'listed transaction'," citing Rev. Rul. 2004-20. The ruling applies that status to transactions the same as or substantially similar to its Situation 2, effective February 13, 2004.

The premium-deduction rule of section 264(a)(1), which bars a deduction where the taxpayer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary, sits alongside the section 404 rules that govern plan contributions. For death benefits, section 101(j)(1) limits the exclusion for an employer-owned contract to "the sum of the premiums and other amounts paid by the policyholder for the contract," unless a section 101(j)(2) exception applies and the notice and consent requirements were met; neither alone lifts the cap, and the site's employer-owned life insurance coverage treats this in depth. Whether section 101(j), its notice and consent requirements and Form 8925 reporting reach a particular plan's contracts needs individual review by the insurers involved and a qualified tax professional.

A contract distributed at retirement raises the section 101(a)(2) transfer-for-value question. State insurance rules governing the contracts vary by state.

Alternatives a High-Income Owner Typically Evaluates

Other designs are usually compared side by side. A traditional defined-benefit plan shares the section 415(b) ceiling and section 404 deduction framework but is not limited to insurance contracts and is subject to the minimum funding rules; the site's 412(e)(3) and traditional plan comparison sets out the differences.

A cash balance plan is a defined-benefit plan that states the benefit as a hypothetical account and is also subject to section 415(b); a dedicated comparison page covers it. A 401(k) with profit-sharing is a defined-contribution plan subject to section 415(c), with a 2026 limit of $72,000 under the IRS COLA table; the site's 412(e)(3) vs. 401(k) comparison addresses it.

An executive bonus arrangement, an industry term rather than a qualified plan or a Code-defined term, treats premiums as compensation under section 162(a)(1), which allows "a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation," and the amount is taxable to the employee; reasonableness turns on the facts.

Planning Example: Hypothetical High-Income Owner at the Section 415(b) Ceiling

Hypothetical. Assumptions: an owner-employee is 55, the plan's normal retirement age is 65, the owner's high-three average compensation is $400,000, the plan formula would otherwise target the maximum permitted benefit, and the compensation the plan may count is within the Code's compensation limit for the years used.

  1. Dollar limit, 2026: $290,000 a year (Notice 2025-67).
  2. Compensation limit: 100% × $400,000 = $400,000 a year.
  3. Lesser of the two: $290,000 is less than $400,000, so the maximum annual benefit is $290,000.
  4. Funding: the contracts are designed to fund a $290,000 annual benefit over 10 years (65 − 55 = 10) of level premiums. The actual contribution depends on actuarial assumptions and the contracts' terms, so no figure is shown.
  5. Comparison: a defined-contribution plan's 2026 limit is $72,000 per year (IRS COLA table). Over 10 years, 10 × $72,000 = $720,000 of annual additions at most, versus a benefit stream of $290,000 per year from age 65.

This hypothetical is for illustration only and does not represent any individual's result.

We're Here for You

We're your trusted California business life insurance advisor. Call us 7 days a week, or send us a message, to have a real conversation about what your business needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does it mean for a pension plan to be fully funded through insurance contracts?

It means the plan holds nothing but insurance and annuity contracts. Section 412(e)(3)(A) requires a plan "funded exclusively by the purchase of individual insurance contracts," and section 412(e)(3)(C) requires plan benefits to equal the contracts' benefits at normal retirement age, backed by a licensed insurer to the extent premiums have been paid.

What are the retirement plan options for high-income business owners?

Owners commonly compare traditional defined-benefit plans, fully insured 412(e)(3) plans, cash balance plans and 401(k) profit-sharing plans. Defined-benefit designs are limited by section 415(b); defined-contribution plans by section 415(c). Executive bonus arrangements are not qualified plans and are treated as compensation under section 162(a)(1).

How does the section 415(b) benefit limit affect a 412(e)(3) plan for a high-income owner?

It caps the annual benefit the plan may promise. The cap is the lesser of the indexed dollar limit, $290,000 for 2026 under Notice 2025-67, or 100 percent of high-three average compensation. At high pay the dollar limit usually binds, which in turn limits the contribution needed to fund the benefit.

Was a 412(e)(3) plan previously called a 412(i) plan?

Yes. The IRS states that before the Pension Protection Act of 2006 these plans were "412(i) plans," and that the provisions were relocated to section 412(e)(3) for plan years beginning after December 31, 2007. The regulations remain at Treas. Reg. § 1.412(i)-1.

What IRS compliance concerns apply to 412(e)(3) plans?

The main concern is listed-transaction status. Under Rev. Rul. 2004-20, an arrangement is listed where the employer deducts premiums on a contract whose death benefit exceeds the participant's plan death benefit by more than $100,000. Failing any section 412(e)(3)(A)-(F) condition also removes the minimum funding exemption.

How are contributions to a 412(e)(3) plan deducted?

They are governed by section 404(a), which allows employer contributions to a pension plan to be deducted only "under this section" and within its limits. Section 264(a)(1) separately bars premium deductions where the taxpayer is a beneficiary. How these interact for a particular plan depends on its design and contracts.

What happens to the life insurance contract in a 412(e)(3) plan when the owner retires?

The plan may distribute the contract to the participant or use its value to provide the annuity benefit. The tax result depends on the plan's terms and the participant's elections, and a distribution raises the section 101(a)(2) transfer-for-value question, where section 101(a)(2)(B) excepts a transfer to the insured.

Educational information only. Not legal, tax, investment or insurance advice. Product availability and outcomes depend on individual circumstances.

Related Profession & Strategy Pages

Compare Alternatives

Sources & Methodology

Remain Life Insurance Services, LLC