Business planning perspective888-464-8341
Business Life Insurance

Buy-Sell Agreement Funding

How Much Life Insurance Should Fund a Buy-Sell Agreement?

Published October 8, 2026 · Updated October 9, 2026

Key takeaways

  • The death benefit of each policy is generally matched to the agreed purchase price of the interest that policy funds.
  • The buy-sell agreement fixes the price, and the insurance is sized to match it, not the reverse.
  • The valuation method in the agreement (fixed price, formula or appraisal) produces the number the coverage targets.
  • Coverage that is not revisited when the business's value changes can leave a gap between the death benefit and the price.
  • In Connelly v. United States (2024), the Supreme Court held that the corporation's contractual obligation to redeem a deceased shareholder's shares did not diminish the value of those shares, because redemption obligations are not necessarily liabilities that reduce a corporation's value for the federal estate tax. The Court decided that valuation question on the facts before it, and it matters for entity-purchase structures.
  • Transfers of policies between owners can trigger the transfer-for-value rule in section 101(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code, with listed exceptions in sections 101(a)(2)(A) and (B).

Short Answer: Coverage Follows the Agreement's Price for Each Interest

The life insurance funding a buy-sell agreement is generally sized to the purchase price the agreement sets for each owner's interest. The agreement, not the insurer, fixes that price through a stated amount, a formula or an appraisal. Because business values change, the coverage stays aligned only when the price and the death benefits are reviewed together.

Co-owners usually ask this question when they sign a new agreement or find that an older one no longer matches what the business is worth. Business Life Insurance explains how the price is set, what keeps the coverage aligned with it, and which federal rules affect the sizing decision.

How a Buy-Sell Agreement Sets the Coverage Amount

The business problem comes first. When a co-owner dies, the surviving owners usually want to keep control of the company, and the deceased owner's family usually wants to be paid fairly. A buy-sell agreement is a contract among co-owners, or between the owners and the business, that obligates a buyer to purchase and the departing owner or the estate to sell an interest when a defined trigger event occurs, such as death.

Life insurance is the funding mechanism inside that contract. At death, the death benefit is paid to the buyer, which is either a co-owner or the entity depending on the structure, and the buyer uses it to pay for the deceased owner's interest. Hypothetically, if the agreement obligates a buyer to pay $1,000,000 for an interest, the policy funding that obligation is typically written for a $1,000,000 death benefit.

Common price-setting methods include:

  1. Fixed price. The owners state a dollar amount and update it by amendment.
  2. Formula. A defined calculation, such as a multiple of earnings or cash flow, applied at the trigger date.
  3. Appraisal. An independent business valuation performed at or near the trigger event.

Each method produces a different number and needs a different review rhythm. The agreement's mechanism sets the coverage target. Business Life Insurance supplies no coverage formula and no recommendation.

Ownership also matters for the rules on employer-owned contracts. IRS Notice 2009-48, A-1, states that "a contract that is owned by the owner of an entity engaged in a trade or business (such as for purposes of financing the purchase of an equity interest of another owner) … is not an employer-owned life insurance contract." The broader mechanics of buy-sell life insurance are explained on their own page.

Who This Page Is For

The page addresses co-owners of closely held businesses: partnerships, LLCs, S corporations, C corporations and professional practices with two or more owners. It covers three situations:

  • Owners who have a signed buy-sell agreement and are sizing or reviewing the life insurance that funds it.
  • Owners who are negotiating a new agreement and want to see how the coverage amount is derived from the price.
  • Finance leads who track whether existing death benefits still match the agreement.

The page answers the sizing question only. The choice between structures is a separate question, and the mechanics of a cross-purchase buy-sell agreement are described on their own page. Solo owners and single-member entities have no co-owner to buy their interest, so buy-sell funding usually works differently for them. Key-person coverage and loan-related coverage are covered on other pages of the site.

When Buy-Sell Life Insurance Coverage May Fit

Sizing life insurance to a buy-sell price tends to be relevant when the following facts are present:

  • The business has two or more owners and a signed or planned agreement with a defined purchase price or valuation method.
  • The surviving owners or the entity would not have enough liquid funds to buy a deceased owner's interest without insurance proceeds.
  • The owners want the price funded at the moment of death, without selling business assets or taking on new debt.
  • The agreement lists death as a trigger event.
  • The interest is valuable enough that an unfunded obligation would strain the surviving owners or the business.

Where these facts hold, the agreement's price gives the coverage a defined target.

When Buy-Sell Life Insurance Coverage May Not Fit

Misalignment is the usual problem, and it comes in several forms:

  • The agreement's price has not been updated and no longer reflects the business's current value, so the coverage may be too low or too high.
  • The business has grown since the policies were issued, and the death benefit no longer equals the current purchase price.
  • The agreement has changed from cross-purchase to entity purchase, or the other way around, but policy ownership and beneficiary designations still reflect the old structure.
  • A policy was moved between owners or to the entity without analysis under the transfer-for-value rule in section 101(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.
  • The owners use an entity-purchase arrangement and have not considered how Connelly v. United States treats corporate-held insurance proceeds in valuing a deceased shareholder's shares.

In each case the insurance may exist, but it may no longer fund the obligation the agreement actually creates.

We're Here for You

We're your trusted California business life insurance advisor. Call us 7 days a week, or send us a message, to have a real conversation about what your business needs.

Ownership, Premiums and Beneficiary in a Buy-Sell Structure

Two structures dominate.

Cross-purchase. Each co-owner owns a policy on each other co-owner's life, pays its premiums and is its beneficiary. At a death, the surviving owner collects the proceeds and buys the deceased owner's interest from the estate.

Entity purchase (stock redemption). The business owns a policy on each owner, pays the premiums, is the beneficiary and uses the proceeds to redeem the deceased owner's interest from the estate.

Section 264(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that "No deduction shall be allowed for … Premiums on any life insurance policy … if the taxpayer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary under the policy."

Section 101(a)(1) provides that gross income generally "does not include amounts received … under a life insurance contract, if such amounts are paid by reason of the death of the insured." Two limits matter here:

  • Transfer for value. Under section 101(a)(2), when a policy is transferred "for a valuable consideration," the exclusion generally cannot exceed the consideration paid plus later premiums and other amounts the transferee pays. Section 101(a)(2)(B) excepts transfers "to the insured, to a partner of the insured, to a partnership in which the insured is a partner, or to a corporation in which the insured is a shareholder or officer."
  • Employer-owned contracts. Under section 101(j), the exclusion for an employer-owned contract is capped at the premiums and other amounts paid. The cap is lifted only if a section 101(j)(2) exception applies, either one based on the insured's status or one for amounts paid to the insured's heirs or used to buy an equity interest from them, and the written notice and consent requirements of section 101(j)(4) were met before the contract was issued. Notice and consent alone do not lift the cap, and an exception alone does not lift it either.

IRS Notice 2009-48, A-3, adds that ownership "by a partnership or sole proprietorship does not prevent the contract from being treated as an employer-owned life insurance contract." A-5 notes that "employee" includes an officer, director and highly compensated employee. Transfers of policies between owners, section 101(j) notice and consent, and the valuation of the interests need individual review of the contracts involved by the insurers and a qualified tax professional. The way premium payer, owner and beneficiary fit together is laid out in how business life insurance works.

Key Factors That Affect the Coverage Amount

The agreed price, or the method that produces it, is the main driver. Other factors determine how that price turns into individual policies:

  • Each owner's percentage interest. Hypothetically, in a two-owner business valued at $2,000,000 with equal interests, each interest is $1,000,000, and each policy would be sized at $1,000,000.
  • The number of owners. In a cross-purchase structure with N owners in which each owner holds one policy on every other owner, the number of policies is N × (N − 1). With four owners, that is 4 × 3 = 12 policies. In an entity purchase, the entity holds one policy per owner.
  • Sensitivity to performance. An earnings formula produces a higher price in a strong year and a lower one in a weak year. A fixed price stays current only when it is amended.
  • The Connelly decision. The Supreme Court held that the corporation's contractual obligation to redeem the deceased shareholder's shares "did not diminish the value of those shares," and noted that, because the corporation received the insurance proceeds, they increased the value of those shares. Section 2031(a) includes in the gross estate "the value at the time of his death of all property." In a redemption structure, the shares' estate-tax value and the price the estate receives can therefore differ.

The coverage target is the number the agreement produces. The factors that drive premiums are described on the page on business life insurance cost.

Potential Advantages of Coverage Matched to the Price

Matching the death benefit to the price has several practical effects:

  • The buyer receives the funds needed to complete the purchase when the trigger event occurs, without selling assets or taking on new debt.
  • The deceased owner's estate receives the agreed price, which gives the family liquidity in place of an illiquid business interest.
  • The risk that a surviving owner or the entity cannot perform its purchase obligation is reduced.
  • The parties avoid a shortfall that would otherwise have to be covered from other sources or settled by renegotiating the price.

On income tax, section 101(a)(1) generally excludes death benefits from the recipient's gross income. That exclusion is subject to the transfer-for-value rule in section 101(a)(2) and, for employer-owned contracts, to the cap in section 101(j). Whether the exclusion applies to a particular contract depends on how that contract was acquired and owned.

Important Considerations and Risks

Each risk below can affect whether the coverage actually performs its funding role:

  • Underfunding. If coverage is not updated as the business grows, the buyer receives less than the price and must fund the difference.
  • Overfunding. Coverage above the price means premiums are paid on death benefit the agreement does not require. The excess does not raise the price unless the agreement says it does.
  • Entity-purchase valuation. The Connelly opinion explains that, because the corporation receives the proceeds, they "increase the value" of the deceased shareholder's shares. The estate's estate-tax value can therefore exceed what a redemption obligation alone would suggest. Broader estate inclusion of life insurance is a separate estate-planning topic.
  • Transfer for value. A policy moved between owners or to the entity may lose part of the section 101(a)(2) exclusion unless an exception in section 101(a)(2) applies, and those exceptions fit some structures but not others.
  • Section 2703. Section 2703(a) generally provides that, for purposes of the Code's estate and gift tax subtitle, the value of property is determined without regard to an option, agreement or other right to acquire it at a price below fair market value, or to a restriction on the right to sell or use it. Section 2703(b) lifts that rule only if the arrangement meets each of three requirements: it is "a bona fide business arrangement"; it is "not a device to transfer such property to members of the decedent's family for less than full and adequate consideration"; and its terms are "comparable to similar arrangements entered into by persons in an arms' length transaction." The Court noted that a redemption agreement's price is "ordinarily not dispositive" for estate-tax value.
  • Premiums. Under section 264(a)(1), premiums are not deductible when the payer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary.
  • Policy terms. Insurance rules vary by state, and policy terms vary by insurer. Those terms are confirmed with the insurers involved.

When to Review the Coverage Amount

Coverage is usually revisited when the facts behind the price change. Common triggers include:

  • A material change in value, such as revenue growth, an acquisition or the loss of a major customer.
  • A change in ownership percentages, such as a partial buyout or the admission of a new owner.
  • An amendment that changes the price or the valuation method.
  • A change in structure, which raises questions about policy ownership, beneficiary designations and the transfer-for-value treatment of any policy transfers.
  • A significant change in tax law, or a court decision such as Connelly v. United States.

Some agreements specify a review interval. Where an agreement is silent, the owners and their advisers decide how often to review it, and the right frequency depends on facts no general explainer can know.

Hypothetical Example: Sizing Coverage for a Two-Owner Business

This example is hypothetical. It uses round figures and does not reflect any reader's own result.

Assumptions (hypothetical): two equal co-owners, A and B; a formula in the agreement values the business at $2,000,000; a cross-purchase structure; no premium figures or insurer terms are assumed.

  1. Each interest: $2,000,000 × 50% = $1,000,000.
  2. Policies: Owner A owns a $1,000,000 policy on B's life, and Owner B owns a $1,000,000 policy on A's life. That makes 2 × (2 − 1) = 2 policies, each sized to the interest it funds.
  3. Growth (hypothetical): Five years later the formula produces $3,000,000. Each interest is now $3,000,000 × 50% = $1,500,000. The funding gap per interest is $1,500,000 − $1,000,000 = $500,000.
  4. Closing the gap: Bringing the funding back in line would typically involve more death benefit on each life, which is subject to insurability and to each insurer's terms.

We're Here for You

We're your trusted California business life insurance advisor. Call us 7 days a week, or send us a message, to have a real conversation about what your business needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if the business grows and the coverage is no longer enough?

A funding gap opens. The buyer receives less than the current price and must cover the difference from other sources or renegotiate the price. Owners in this position typically compare the agreement's current price with the existing death benefits to measure the gap.

Does the buy-sell agreement's price control the coverage amount, or does the insurer set it?

The agreement's price or valuation method sets the coverage target. The insurer does not set the purchase price. It considers the death benefit an applicant requests, subject to its own underwriting and terms, which vary from insurer to insurer.

Are life insurance proceeds that fund a buy-sell purchase taxable to the buyer?

Section 101(a)(1) generally excludes death benefits from gross income. A transfer for value under section 101(a)(2) can limit that exclusion unless a section 101(a)(2) exception applies. For employer-owned contracts, section 101(j) caps the exclusion unless an exception applies and written notice and consent preceded issuance.

How does Connelly v. United States affect buy-sell coverage sizing?

The Court held that the corporation's contractual obligation to redeem a deceased shareholder's shares did not diminish the value of those shares, because redemption obligations are not necessarily liabilities that reduce a corporation's value for the federal estate tax. Because the corporation received the insurance proceeds, those proceeds increased the shares' value. The decision addresses that valuation question on its facts.

Can the business deduct the premiums it pays on buy-sell life insurance?

Section 264(a)(1) disallows a deduction for premiums when the taxpayer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary under the policy. In an entity purchase, the entity is the beneficiary. In a cross-purchase, each owner is the beneficiary of the policies that owner holds.

Does section 2703 affect whether the buy-sell price is respected for estate-tax purposes?

Yes. Section 2703(a) generally disregards a below-market purchase option or a sale restriction for valuation purposes. Section 2703(b) lifts that rule only when the arrangement is a bona fide business arrangement, is not a device to transfer property to family members for less than full consideration, and has terms comparable to arm's-length arrangements.

Is a policy one co-owner owns on another co-owner considered an employer-owned contract?

IRS Notice 2009-48, A-1, states that a contract owned by an owner of an entity to finance buying another owner's equity interest is not an employer-owned contract. A-3 adds that ownership by a partnership or sole proprietorship does not, by itself, prevent employer-owned status. The answer turns on who owns the contract.

Educational information only. Not legal, tax, investment or insurance advice. Product availability and outcomes depend on individual circumstances.

Related Strategies

Compare Alternatives

Sources & Methodology

Remain Life Insurance Services, LLC