Business planning perspective888-464-8341
Business Life Insurance

Key Person Insurance

Is Key Person Insurance Tax-Deductible? Why Section 264(a)(1) Usually Says No

Published October 6, 2026 · Updated October 10, 2026

Technical summary / key takeaways

  • Key person premiums are generally not deductible when the business is directly or indirectly a beneficiary, under 26 U.S.C. § 264(a)(1).
  • Treas. Reg. § 1.264-1(b) treats a business that takes out a policy "for the purpose of protecting himself from loss" on the insured's death as a beneficiary.
  • An executive bonus arrangement is a different structure: the business pays the premium as compensation, the employee owns the policy, and the business is not the beneficiary.
  • How the death benefit is taxed is a separate question from the premium-deduction question under section 264(a)(1), and it is governed by section 101, including its employer-owned contract rules.
  • Whether any alternative structure produces a deduction depends on the facts of the arrangement and the contracts involved.

Technical Summary: The Section 264(a)(1) Rule on Key Person Premiums

When a business owns a key person policy and names itself as beneficiary, the premiums are generally not tax-deductible. Section 264(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code disallows any deduction for life insurance premiums when the taxpayer is "directly or indirectly a beneficiary." This applies to term and permanent policies alike, whatever the business purpose.

The question usually comes from an owner, partner or finance lead at a closely held company. The business depends on one person, it has bought or is considering a policy to fund that risk, and it wants to know how the premium shows up on the return. Business Life Insurance treats the policy as one funding mechanism inside a continuity plan. The analysis looks at three facts: who owns the policy, who pays the premiums and who is the beneficiary. Under section 264(a)(1), beneficiary status is the fact that triggers the disallowance.

"Key person insurance," also called "key man insurance," is an industry label. Section 264 uses the term "key person" only in subsection (e), a rule on interest paid or accrued on debt with respect to policies the taxpayer owns, not on premiums; there it means "an officer or 20-percent owner," with a limit on how many individuals qualify. In the standard arrangement the business owns the policy, pays for it and receives the death benefit. That structure is the one section 264(a)(1) reaches. Treasury Regulation § 1.264-1 implements the statute and describes when a business counts as a beneficiary.

What Key Person Insurance Is: Definition and Structure

The business problem comes first. A company whose revenue, client relationships, credit or operations rest on one owner, executive or employee faces a real cost if that person dies. The costs can include recruiting and training a replacement, revenue lost during the transition, and repayment of a loan a lender calls when that person dies. Key person insurance is a life insurance policy that a business owns on the life of such a person, so that a death benefit is available to absorb those costs. "Key man insurance" and "key employee insurance" are other industry names for the same arrangement. The site's key person insurance overview covers the concept itself.

The mechanics of the standard arrangement are simple:

  • Owner: the business holds the contract and its rights.
  • Premium payer: the business pays the premiums to the insurer.
  • Beneficiary: the business is named to receive the death benefit.
  • Use of proceeds: the business applies the death benefit to its own loss, such as replacement costs, lost revenue or debt repayment.

The policy may be term insurance, which covers a stated period, or permanent insurance, which can carry a cash value. Cash value is the contract's accumulated value, and it is a feature of the contract. The policy type does not decide deductibility. Because the Code does not define "key person insurance," the tax analysis looks past the label to ownership and beneficiary status.

The Applicable Rules: Section 264(a)(1) and Its Regulation

The statute is short. Section 264(a) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that "No deduction shall be allowed for— (1) Premiums on any life insurance policy, or endowment or annuity contract, if the taxpayer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary under the policy or contract."

The regulation adds detail about whose life is covered. Treas. Reg. § 1.264-1(a) provides that premiums "are not deductible from the taxpayer's gross income, even though they would otherwise be deductible as trade or business expenses, if they are paid on a life insurance policy covering the life of any officer or employee of the taxpayer, or any person (including the taxpayer) who is financially interested in any trade or business carried on by the taxpayer, when the taxpayer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary of the policy."

Treas. Reg. § 1.264-1(b) then makes purpose enough for beneficiary status: "If a taxpayer takes out a policy for the purpose of protecting himself from loss in the event of the death of the insured, the taxpayer is considered a beneficiary directly or indirectly under the policy." That sentence describes the ordinary key person policy almost exactly.

The regulation also sets a boundary. If the taxpayer "is not a beneficiary under the policy," premiums "will not be disallowed as deductions merely because the taxpayer may derive a benefit from the increased efficiency of the officer or employee insured." The phrase "directly or indirectly" means a business does not escape the rule only because it is not the named beneficiary. The regulation's own example involves a partner who insures his own life and irrevocably names his partner as beneficiary to keep the partner invested. The partner paying the premium is treated as a beneficiary.

The rule also takes priority over the general deduction. Section 162(a) allows a deduction for "all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business." Section 264(a)(1) is a specific disallowance, and the regulation's words "even though they would otherwise be deductible as trade or business expenses" make clear that it controls.

Requirements That Trigger the Disallowance

Read together, the statute and regulation point to three facts:

  1. A life insurance policy. Section 264(a)(1) also covers endowment and annuity contracts.
  2. A covered life. Under Treas. Reg. § 1.264-1(a), this is an officer, an employee or any person "financially interested" in the business, including the taxpayer. IRS Publication 334 (2025) says a person has a financial interest in a business "if the person is an owner or part owner of the business or has lent money to the business." Owners, partners and shareholders therefore fall inside the rule, not only employees. For contracts issued after June 8, 1997, the same publication says "The disallowance applies without regard to whom the policy covers," so for those contracts this element does not narrow the rule.
  3. Beneficiary status. The business is directly or indirectly a beneficiary.

A standard key person policy meets all three. The business owns a life insurance policy on an officer, employee or owner and is the beneficiary. Whether the premium would otherwise pass the ordinary-and-necessary test of section 162(a) does not change that result.

Real arrangements are not always standard. Ownership can be split, beneficiaries can be layered, and side agreements can redirect proceeds. Premium deductibility under section 264(a)(1) is a topic that needs individual review: the structure, ownership and tax treatment of the arrangement should be confirmed with qualified tax, legal and insurance professionals.

How the Rules Work in Practice

For federal income tax purposes, the premium is an outlay that does not reduce taxable income. The business pays it from after-tax funds, and section 264(a)(1) blocks the deduction that section 162(a) would otherwise allow. IRS Publication 334 (2025) states the point for small businesses: "you generally can't deduct the premiums on any life insurance policy, endowment contract, or annuity contract if you are directly or indirectly a beneficiary." The publication lists, among deductible insurance, "Life insurance covering your employees if you are not directly or indirectly the beneficiary under the contract."

IRS Publication 334 (2025) addresses lending situations directly: "If you take out a policy on your life or on the life of another person with a financial interest in your business to get or protect a business loan, you can't deduct the premiums as a business expense. Nor can you deduct the premiums as interest on business loans or as an expense of financing loans."

The death benefit is a separate question. Section 101(a)(1) generally excludes from gross income amounts received under a life insurance contract "by reason of the death of the insured." That exclusion has limits that matter in business planning, including the transfer-for-value rule in section 101(a)(2) and, for employer-owned contracts, section 101(j). The site's key person insurance tax treatment page covers how proceeds and the contract are taxed.

On a permanent policy, part of each premium supports the contract's cash value. That growth is a feature of the contract, not a deduction. The premium that funds it is disallowed in the same way as the rest of the premium.

Who This Page Is For

This page is written for people who see a key person premium on the books and want to know how the federal rules treat it:

  • Owners and shareholders of closely held C corporations and S corporations that own, or are considering, a policy on a founder or key executive.
  • Partners in partnerships and members of LLCs weighing coverage on a co-owner or key employee.
  • Finance leads and controllers at small and mid-size businesses preparing returns or budgets.
  • Executives and owner-employees who want to understand why their company's key person premiums do not appear as a deduction.

The page explains federal income tax rules. State income tax treatment may differ and varies by state. The broader question of whether life insurance is ever a business expense is covered on the site's business life insurance deductibility page.

We're Here for You

We're your trusted California business life insurance advisor. Call us 7 days a week, or send us a message, to have a real conversation about what your business needs.

When Section 264(a)(1) Applies to a Key Person Policy

The disallowance applies most clearly when these facts line up:

  • The business owns the policy and is the named beneficiary.
  • The business pays the premiums to the insurer.
  • The insured is an officer, employee, owner, partner or other person financially interested in the business, as Treas. Reg. § 1.264-1(a) describes.
  • The purpose is to fund the business's own loss on the insured's death, which is the "protecting himself from loss" situation in Treas. Reg. § 1.264-1(b).

None of the statute's terms depends on the type of policy, the size of the premium or the face amount. Section 264(a)(1) refers to premiums on "any life insurance policy." For readers comparing this funding use with an ownership-transfer use, the site compares key person insurance and buy-sell insurance.

When the Disallowance May Not Apply: Alternative Structures

Any discussion of a deductible structure starts from the same rule: under section 264(a)(1), no premium deduction is allowed when the business is directly or indirectly a beneficiary. A different result requires a different arrangement, not a different label on the same one.

Executive bonus arrangement. "Executive bonus plan," "section 162 plan," "restricted executive bonus arrangement" (REBA) and "double bonus" are industry terms. They are not qualified plans and are not defined in the Internal Revenue Code or the regulations. In this structure the business pays an amount to the employee as additional compensation. The employee owns the policy and names his or her own beneficiary, and the business is not a beneficiary. The arrangement therefore does not meet the beneficiary condition that triggers section 264(a)(1). It is also not a key person policy, because the business is not insuring its own loss.

Two other rules then govern:

  • The business side. Section 162(a)(1) allows a deduction for "a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered." Treas. Reg. § 1.162-7(a) states that the test "is whether they are reasonable and are in fact payments purely for services." Treas. Reg. § 1.162-9 allows bonuses "made in good faith and as additional compensation" that, added to salary, "do not exceed a reasonable compensation." In a closely held corporation, Treas. Reg. § 1.162-7(b)(1) notes that excessive payments tied to stockholdings may be treated as a distribution of earnings rather than compensation.
  • The employee side. Section 61(a)(1) includes in gross income "Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items," and Treas. Reg. § 1.61-2(d)(1) includes compensation paid in property at fair market value. The bonus is taxable to the employee.

Whether an amount is reasonable is a facts-and-circumstances question. The site's executive bonus deductibility page addresses it.

Other structures. Split-dollar arrangements and fully insured defined-benefit plans described in section 412(e)(3) have their own ownership and tax rules. A section 412(e)(3) plan must meet all six requirements in section 412(e)(3)(A)-(F), including that "the plan is funded exclusively by the purchase of individual insurance contracts." The IRS page Fully insured 412(e)(3) plans states that before the Pension Protection Act of 2006, these plans were known as "412(i) plans." The site's 412(e)(3) deduction page covers them. Whether any of these structures produces a deduction depends on the specific facts, including who owns each policy, who pays the premiums and who is the beneficiary.

Compliance Considerations for Key Person Policies

Non-deductibility is only one of the rules that apply to a business-owned policy. A business-owned key person policy on an employee will often be an "employer-owned life insurance contract" as defined in section 101(j)(3), depending on its facts. For such a contract, section 101(j)(1) caps the death-benefit exclusion at "the sum of the premiums and other amounts paid by the policyholder for the contract," unless the written notice and consent required by section 101(j)(4) were completed "before the issuance of the contract" and an exception in section 101(j)(2) applies. Notice and consent alone do not lift the cap, and neither does an exception alone. Section 6039I also requires an applicable policyholder owning employer-owned contracts to file a return "for each year such contracts are owned" and to keep records.

Notice and consent under section 101(j) and the related annual reporting need individual review by qualified tax, legal and insurance professionals. These obligations apply independently of the section 264(a)(1) disallowance, and the site's key person insurance tax treatment and requirements pages explain them.

Common Errors in Treating Key Person Premiums

Most errors come from relying on a label or a business purpose instead of the structure:

  • Deducting the premium under section 162(a). Section 264(a)(1) disallows the deduction when the business is a beneficiary.
  • Mixing up the structures. A business-owned, business-beneficiary key person policy is treated differently from an employee-owned executive bonus policy.
  • Treating business purpose as enough. Protecting against the loss of a key person is a legitimate purpose, but Treas. Reg. § 1.264-1(b) makes that purpose the reason the business counts as a beneficiary.
  • Skipping the section 6039I return for employer-owned contracts.
  • Missing written notice and consent before issuance. This can limit the exclusion under section 101(j). Notice 2009-48, A-13, describes limited relief for inadvertent failures discovered and corrected by the return due date for the year of issue, with conditions. It also states that a failure to obtain written consent "cannot be corrected after the insured employee has died."
  • Treating cash value as a deductible contribution. Cash value is a contract feature, and the premium that funds it remains disallowed.

Hypothetical Example: How Section 264(a)(1) Applies

This example is hypothetical. It uses round figures and is not any reader's result.

Assumptions: A corporation buys a term policy on a key employee. The corporation is the owner, the premium payer and the named beneficiary. The annual premium is $10,000. No other facts affect the analysis.

Key person structure:

  1. The premium paid is $10,000.
  2. The corporation is directly a beneficiary, so section 264(a)(1) disallows the deduction.
  3. The deduction allowed for the premium is $0.
  4. Reduction in taxable income: $10,000 paid − $10,000 disallowed = $0.
  5. The $10,000 is a non-deductible business outlay.

Contrasting executive bonus structure (hypothetical):

  1. The corporation pays the employee a $10,000 bonus. The employee owns a policy on his or her own life and names a personal beneficiary.
  2. The corporation is not a beneficiary, so the section 264(a)(1) condition is absent.
  3. The $10,000 may be deductible as compensation under section 162(a)(1), but only if total compensation is reasonable.
  4. The employee includes $10,000 in gross income under section 61(a).

In both structures the dollars are the same. The difference comes from who owns the policy and who is the beneficiary. Actual treatment depends on the facts of a specific arrangement.

Professional Coordination for Key Person Insurance Tax Questions

These questions typically involve several professionals. A tax professional, such as a CPA or tax attorney, handles the deductibility and income-inclusion analysis. An attorney handles the business agreements. A licensed insurance professional handles policy ownership and beneficiary designations. Structure, ownership and tax treatment are typically confirmed with these professionals before the policy is issued, because the section 101(j) notice and consent must come before issuance. Notice 2009-48 offers only the narrow inadvertent-failure relief described in its A-13. Insurers' forms and procedures vary from insurer to insurer and are confirmed with the insurers involved. State insurance rules vary by state.

We're Here for You

We're your trusted California business life insurance advisor. Call us 7 days a week, or send us a message, to have a real conversation about what your business needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are key person insurance premiums not tax-deductible?

Section 264(a)(1) disallows a deduction for life insurance premiums when the taxpayer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary. In the standard key person arrangement the business is owner and beneficiary, so the disallowance generally applies. Treas. Reg. § 1.264-1(b) treats a business that insures against its own loss as a beneficiary.

Is key man insurance tax-deductible if the business pays the premiums?

Payment by the business does not by itself create a deduction. The rule turns on whether the business is a beneficiary, not on who writes the check. When the business is the beneficiary, the premium is generally non-deductible even though the business pays it.

What are the disadvantages of key man insurance from a tax standpoint?

The main one is that premiums are generally paid with after-tax dollars under section 264(a)(1). In addition, for an employer-owned contract, section 101(j)(1) caps the death-benefit exclusion of section 101(a)(1) at the premiums and other amounts paid, unless written notice and consent were given before issuance and a section 101(j)(2) exception applies.

Can a business deduct key person insurance as a business expense under Section 162?

Generally not, when the business is a beneficiary. Treas. Reg. § 1.264-1(a) says the premiums are not deductible "even though they would otherwise be deductible as trade or business expenses." The specific disallowance controls over the general rule in section 162(a).

Is there any way to make key person insurance premiums deductible?

Not while the business remains a beneficiary. A different arrangement, such as an executive bonus in which the employee owns the policy, may be deductible as compensation under section 162(a)(1) if reasonable, and it is taxable to the employee. Whether it fits a situation depends on the facts.

Does Section 264(a)(1) apply to both term and permanent key person policies?

Yes. The statute refers to premiums on "any life insurance policy," and nothing in it turns on the policy type. The cash value inside a permanent policy does not change the result.

Educational information only. Not legal, tax, investment or insurance advice. Product availability and outcomes depend on individual circumstances.

Related Strategies

Compare Alternatives

Primary & Authoritative Sources

Remain Life Insurance Services, LLC