Business planning perspective888-464-8341
Business Life Insurance

Section 412(e)(3) Plans

What Is a 412(i) Plan? The Former Name for a 412(e)(3) Plan

Published October 7, 2026 · Updated October 7, 2026

Technical summary / key takeaways

  • "412(i) plan," "412i plan," "412 i plan," "section 412(i)," "412i pension plan" and "412i retirement plan" are all names for the plan now governed by 26 U.S.C. § 412(e)(3).
  • PPA '06 moved the statute, but the IRS states that the regulation remains at Treas. Reg. § 1.412(i)-1.
  • A plan is described in section 412(e)(3) only if it meets all six conditions in subparagraphs (A) through (F) of that paragraph.
  • Contributions are deductible only within the limits of 26 U.S.C. § 404, and benefits are limited by 26 U.S.C. § 415(b).
  • Rev. Rul. 2004-20 identifies as listed transactions arrangements the same as, or substantially similar to, its Situation 2, in which a plan holds life insurance on a participant above the participant's death benefit under the plan, provided that the employer has deducted amounts used to pay premiums on a contract whose death benefit exceeds the participant's death benefit under the plan by more than $100,000.
  • The plan is a qualified defined-benefit plan with statutory requirements. The insurance contracts fund it. Those contracts are not the plan itself, and the plan is not a premium deduction device.

Technical Summary: 412(i) and 412(e)(3) Are the Same Plan

A 412(i) plan is the former statutory name for what is now a section 412(e)(3) plan under the Internal Revenue Code: a fully insured defined-benefit plan funded exclusively by insurance contracts. The IRS states that the Pension Protection Act of 2006 retained the former section 412(i) provisions but relocated them to section 412(e)(3), effective for plan years beginning after December 31, 2007.

The regulation still uses the section 412(i) number, and so does IRS guidance issued before the change, such as Rev. Rul. 2004-20. "412(i) plan," "412i plan," "412 i plan," "section 412(i)," "412i pension plan" and "412i retirement plan" all refer to this same plan, not to a separate type of plan available today.

In summary:

  • Name. "412(i)" was the Internal Revenue Code designation before the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA '06). The IRS page on fully insured plans says the former provisions "were retained under PPA '06 but were relocated to IRC Section 412(e)(3), effective for plan years beginning after December 31, 2007."
  • Regulation. The same IRS page states that regulations "were not updated after the enactment of PPA '06 and remain in Treas. Reg. Section 1.412(i)-1" (26 C.F.R. § 1.412(i)-1).
  • Plan type. The plan is a defined-benefit plan funded exclusively by insurance contracts, and it must meet all six statutory conditions in 26 U.S.C. § 412(e)(3)(A)–(F).
  • Compliance history. Rev. Rul. 2004-20 identified certain arrangements involving life insurance in these plans as "listed transactions," a designation that still appears on the IRS Listed Transactions page.
  • Primary reference. The IRS page "Fully insured 412(e)(3) plans" is the agency's own summary of the requirements.

Definition: What a 412(i) Plan Is

The term begins with a business problem. An owner or owner-employee may want a retirement benefit set by formula, funded by the business, and sponsored as a qualified plan. The IRS page Retirement plans definitions states that a defined-benefit plan, "also known as a traditional pension plan, promises the participant a specified monthly benefit at retirement," while a defined-contribution plan "is a retirement plan in which the employee and/or the employer contribute to the employee's individual account under the plan." The same page describes a 401(k) plan as "a defined contribution plan." The two structures are compared on the page on 412(e)(3) plans vs a 401(k).

"Fully insured" refers to how the benefit is funded. Section 412(e)(3)(A) describes a plan "funded exclusively by the purchase of individual insurance contracts." The statute also treats a plan funded exclusively by group insurance contracts as described in that paragraph when regulations find that the contracts have the same characteristics. Treas. Reg. § 1.412(i)-1(c) addresses group annuity and group insurance contracts. Section 1.412(i)-1(d) treats a plan funded by a combination of individual and group contracts as described in the section if "the combination, in the aggregate, satisfies the requirements."

"412(i)" was the Code section number for these provisions until PPA '06 relocated them. The regulation's own text still refers to plans "described in section 412(i)," and the IRS describes the number change on its fully insured plans page. The insurance contracts are a funding mechanism inside the plan. Cash value is a feature of each contract. The life insurance is not itself a pension, a savings plan or an investment.

Applicable Rules: The Statutory and Regulatory Framework

Several federal sources govern the plan, and each one does a different job.

  • 26 U.S.C. § 412(e)(3). This is the statutory home of the fully insured plan. Under section 412(e)(2)(B), section 412 "shall not apply to … any insurance contract plan described in paragraph (3)." The IRS states that these plans "are exempt from the minimum funding rules of IRC Section 412 pursuant to IRC Section 412(e)(2)(B)."
  • 26 C.F.R. § 1.412(i)-1. This is the implementing Treasury Regulation. It sets out the conditions for individual contract plans (paragraph (b)), group contract plans (paragraph (c)) and combinations of the two (paragraph (d)), and the IRS states that it was not updated after PPA '06.
  • 26 U.S.C. § 404. Section 404(a) provides that employer contributions to a pension plan "shall not be deductible under this chapter; but, if they would otherwise be deductible, they shall be deductible under this section," subject to its limits.
  • 26 U.S.C. § 415(b). This section caps the annual benefit under a defined-benefit plan at the lesser of a dollar amount stated in the statute, which section 415(d) adjusts annually for cost of living, or "100 percent of the participant's average compensation for his high 3 years," with adjustments for benefits that begin before age 62 or after age 65.
  • Rev. Rul. 2004-20. This ruling addresses when a plan holding life insurance cannot be a section 412(i) plan, when certain employer contributions for life insurance are deductible, and when such transactions are "listed transactions." A listed transaction is a transaction the IRS has identified under the Treasury's disclosure, registration and list-maintenance regulations that the ruling cites.
  • Rev. Rul. 2004-21. This ruling addresses the Code's nondiscrimination requirements for plans funded with life insurance contracts.
  • IRS Listed Transactions page. This official page lists Rev. Rul. 2004-20 under "Abusive Transactions Involving Insurance Policies in IRC 412(i) Retirement Plans."
  • ERISA. Under 29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-3(a), "only employee benefit plans within the meaning of section 3(3) are subject to title I" of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), and under § 2510.3-3(b) that term does not include a plan "under which no employees are participants covered under the plan." The regulation's example is a so-called "Keogh" or "H.R. 10" plan: one "under which only partners or only a sole proprietor are participants covered under the plan will not be covered under title I," while one under which "one or more common law employees, in addition to the self-employed individuals, are participants covered under the plan, will be covered under title I." The specific ERISA requirements depend on the plan's facts.

Requirements: The Six Statutory Conditions Under § 412(e)(3)

Section 412(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code describes a plan as fully insured only if every one of the following conditions is met:

  • (A) Exclusive funding. "The plan is funded exclusively by the purchase of individual insurance contracts." Group contracts may also qualify under the statute's second sentence and Treas. Reg. § 1.412(i)-1(c).
  • (B) Level premiums. The contracts "provide for level annual premium payments to be paid extending not later than the retirement age for each individual participating in the plan, and commencing with the date the individual became a participant in the plan (or, in the case of an increase in benefits, commencing at the time such increase becomes effective)."
  • (C) Benefits equal to contract benefits. The benefits provided by the plan "are equal to the benefits provided under each contract at normal retirement age under the plan," and the statute requires those benefits to be backed by an insurance carrier "licensed under the laws of a State to do business with the plan," to the extent premiums have been paid.
  • (D) Premiums paid. "Premiums payable for the plan year, and all prior plan years, under such contracts have been paid before lapse or there is reinstatement of the policy."
  • (E) No security interest. "No rights under such contracts have been subject to a security interest at any time during the plan year."
  • (F) No policy loans. "No policy loans are outstanding at any time during the plan year."

These conditions apply plan year by plan year, and the statute does not limit them to a set number of early years. A plan that is not described in paragraph (3) does not fall within the section 412(e)(2)(B) exception, so section 412 generally applies to it unless another exception does. Whether a particular plan and its contracts meet each condition needs individual review of the plan document and the contracts by qualified tax, legal and insurance professionals. Each condition is explained further on the page on 412(e)(3) plan requirements.

How the Rules Work: Funding, Deductions and Benefit Limits

The employer makes contributions to the plan, and the plan holds the insurance contracts and pays their premiums. Under Treas. Reg. § 1.412(i)-1(b)(2)(i), the contracts may be purchased "either directly by the employer or through the use of a custodial account or trust." Contract values and proceeds are used to provide the defined benefit that the plan document promises. In Situation 2 of Rev. Rul. 2004-20, the participant's beneficiary receives the death benefit payable under the plan, and the proceeds above it are "applied to the payment of premiums under the plan with respect to other participants." The mechanics are explained further on the page on how a 412(e)(3) plan works.

The premium-deduction rule comes first. Section 264(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that "no deduction shall be allowed for … premiums on any life insurance policy, or endowment or annuity contract, if the taxpayer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary under the policy or contract." The same rule appears in the context of whether key person insurance is deductible. In a fully insured plan, the employer's claimed deduction is for contributions to a qualified plan under section 404, not for premiums on a policy the employer itself owns. How section 264(a)(1) interacts with a particular plan's structure depends on its documents and contracts.

Deduction limits. Section 404(a) allows contributions to be deducted only within its limits. Rev. Rul. 2004-20 states that contributions "used to purchase life insurance coverage for a participant in excess of the participant's death benefit provided under the plan are not fully deductible when contributed." Instead, they are carried over and become deductible in future years only when other contributions fall below the section 404 maximum.

Benefit limits. The benefit equals the contract benefits at normal retirement age under section 412(e)(3)(C). That benefit remains subject to the annual benefit limitation of section 415(b).

Death benefit. Section 101(a)(1) generally excludes from gross income amounts paid under a life insurance contract "by reason of the death of the insured." That exclusion is limited by the transfer-for-value rule in section 101(a)(2) and, for an employer-owned contract, by section 101(j), which caps the exclusion at "the sum of the premiums and other amounts paid by the policyholder for the contract" unless a section 101(j)(2) exception applies and the written notice and consent were given "before the issuance of the contract." Those limits are explained on the page on business life insurance tax treatment.

Listed-transaction exposure. Rev. Rul. 2004-20 concerns plans holding contracts whose benefits exceed the plan's benefits, either at normal retirement age (its Situation 1) or as life insurance above the participant's death benefit under the plan (its Situation 2). It identifies arrangements the same as, or substantially similar to, Situation 2 as listed transactions when the employer has deducted amounts used to pay premiums on a life insurance contract for a participant with a death benefit under the contract that exceeds the participant's death benefit under the plan by more than $100,000.

Who This Is For: Businesses and Owners That May Consider This Plan

This page is written for owners of closely held businesses, partners, owner-employees of professional practices and finance leads who are considering a qualified defined-benefit plan, or who are administering one, and who come across the 412(i) label. Section 412(e)(3)(B) requires level annual premium payments for each participant from the date the individual became a participant until no later than retirement age, and section 412(e)(3)(D) requires the premiums for the plan year and all prior plan years to have been paid before lapse or the policy reinstated. For a participant closer to retirement age, the same benefit is funded over fewer level payments.

Professional practices raise their own ownership and succession questions, which are covered on the page on life insurance for law firms. The plan is not limited to owners. Rev. Rul. 2004-21 applies the Code rule "prohibiting discrimination in favor of highly compensated employees" to plans funded with life insurance. Whether the structure suits a given business turns on facts including the business form, the stability of its income, its employee census and any existing plans.

We're Here for You

We're your trusted California business life insurance advisor. Call us 7 days a week, or send us a message, to have a real conversation about what your business needs.

When It Applies: Situations Where a 412(e)(3) Plan May Be Considered

A 412(e)(3) plan may come up in situations such as these.

  • A business has no existing defined-benefit plan, and its owners are considering a formula benefit funded exclusively by insurance contracts.
  • The business's cash flow can sustain level premiums through each participant's retirement age, as section 412(e)(3)(B) contemplates.
  • The owner's retirement timeline and the business's projected cash flow line up with the level-premium schedule.
  • Owners are reviewing succession and continuity planning together. In that case, the plan's contracts sit inside the plan, while ownership transfer is a separate arrangement, for example a cross-purchase buy-sell agreement.
  • An older plan document or IRS letter uses the "412(i)" label. Under the IRS's description of PPA '06, the relocated provisions at section 412(e)(3) govern plan years beginning after December 31, 2007.

When It May Not Apply: Situations Where the Structure Raises Issues

The structure raises issues in several situations.

  • Uneven income. A business with unpredictable income may struggle to keep paying level premiums. Section 412(e)(3)(D) requires that premiums be "paid before lapse or there is reinstatement of the policy."
  • Excess insurance. Rev. Rul. 2004-20 holds that a plan "cannot be a section 412(i) plan" if its contracts for a participant "provide for benefits at normal retirement age in excess of the participant's benefits at normal retirement age under the terms of the plan." Life insurance above the participant's death benefit under the plan does not by itself have that effect under the ruling, but contributions for it are "not fully deductible when contributed," and an arrangement like the ruling's Situation 2 is a listed transaction where the employer has deducted amounts used to pay premiums on a contract whose death benefit exceeds the participant's death benefit under the plan by more than $100,000.
  • Larger workforces. Rev. Rul. 2004-21 notes that the Code's minimum coverage requirements "are designed to ensure that a qualified plan provides sufficient benefits to a large enough proportion of participants who are nonhighly compensated employees," so the plan's cost can extend to employees other than the owners.
  • Any unmet condition. A plan that fails any of the conditions in section 412(e)(3)(A)–(F) is not described in paragraph (3) and loses that exception from section 412.
  • Liquidity limits. Section 412(e)(3)(E) bars security interests in the contracts, and section 412(e)(3)(F) bars outstanding policy loans, "at any time during the plan year." The contracts therefore cannot serve as collateral or as a source of loans while the plan relies on that description.

Compliance Considerations: Listed Transactions, Disclosure and Ongoing Obligations

Listed-transaction status is a question of disclosure as well as tax treatment. Rev. Rul. 2004-20 identifies as listed transactions those that are the same as, or substantially similar to, the transaction in its Situation 2, provided that the employer has deducted amounts used to pay premiums on a life insurance contract with a death benefit that exceeds the participant's death benefit under the plan by more than $100,000. The ruling states that this identification is effective February 13, 2004, the date it was released to the public.

Rev. Rul. 2004-20 ties the designation to the Treasury's disclosure, registration and list-maintenance regulations. The precise disclosure duties and the consequences of not disclosing depend on the taxpayer and the transaction. A plan that meets every section 412(e)(3) condition and lacks the features described in the ruling is not listed merely because it is fully insured. The distinction turns on the plan's design and contracts.

Whether title I of ERISA applies at all turns on whether any employees are participants covered under the plan (29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-3(b)). How the listed-transaction rules, the section 412(e)(3) conditions and ERISA apply to a specific plan depends on its plan documents and contracts. Insurance rules vary by state.

Common Errors: Misunderstandings About the 412(i) Name and the Plan's Rules

  • Treating 412(i) and 412(e)(3) as two plans. The IRS states that the provisions were retained and relocated. It is one plan type with a new section number.
  • Calling it an insurance deduction. It is a qualified defined-benefit plan. Section 404 limits the deduction, section 415(b) limits the benefit, and the contracts fund the plan rather than being the plan.
  • Assuming every fully insured plan is listed. Rev. Rul. 2004-20 identifies as listed only transactions the same as, or substantially similar to, its Situation 2 where the employer has deducted amounts used to pay premiums on a life insurance contract whose death benefit exceeds the participant's death benefit under the plan by more than $100,000.
  • Assuming the regulation was renumbered. It remains 26 C.F.R. § 1.412(i)-1.
  • Assuming only owners participate. Nondiscrimination and coverage rules can require broader coverage when the business has other employees.
  • Assuming loans are restricted only in early years. Section 412(e)(3)(F) bars outstanding policy loans at any time during the plan year, and section 412(e)(3)(E) bars security interests on the same basis.

Example (Hypothetical): How a 412(e)(3)/412(i) Plan Is Structured

This example is hypothetical. It uses round figures and does not represent any reader's plan, contributions, benefits or deductions.

Assumptions:

  • A professional practice with one owner and no other employees adopts a fully insured plan.
  • The owner is age 55 and has 10 years to the plan's normal retirement age of 65.
  • The plan holds one individual contract on that owner, and the plan meets all six conditions in section 412(e)(3)(A)–(F).
  • The insurer's level annual premium for the plan's promised benefit is assumed to be $50,000. This is an assumed figure, not a rate any insurer quotes.

Steps:

  1. Each year, the practice contributes $50,000 to the plan trust.
  2. The trust pays the $50,000 premium to the insurer, so the premiums are level, as section 412(e)(3)(B) contemplates.
  3. Over 10 years, total premiums are 10 × $50,000 = $500,000.
  4. At age 65, the plan's benefit equals the contract's benefit at normal retirement age, under section 412(e)(3)(C).
  5. That benefit must also fit within the section 415(b) limit. The practice's deduction for the $50,000 contributions is tested under section 404.

Professional Coordination: Who Is Involved in Designing and Maintaining This Plan

Several roles may be involved in setting up and maintaining a fully insured plan.

  • A qualified tax professional may review deductibility under section 404, compliance with section 415(b), and the listed-transaction question.
  • An actuary may prepare the plan's benefit and contribution calculations.
  • A plan administrator may maintain the plan documents and handle the plan's administration.
  • The insurers involved issue the contracts that fund the plan. Insurers' forms, procedures and contract terms vary from insurer to insurer and are confirmed with each one.

We're Here for You

We're your trusted California business life insurance advisor. Call us 7 days a week, or send us a message, to have a real conversation about what your business needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a 412(i) plan the same as a 412(e)(3) plan?

Yes. The IRS states that PPA '06 retained the former section 412(i) provisions and relocated them to section 412(e)(3), effective for plan years beginning after December 31, 2007. The regulation remains Treas. Reg. § 1.412(i)-1.

What is a defined-benefit pension plan?

The IRS describes a defined benefit plan, also known as a traditional pension plan, as one that promises the participant a specified monthly benefit at retirement. A 412(e)(3) plan, formerly a 412(i) plan, is a defined-benefit plan funded exclusively by insurance contracts, and under section 415(b) the annual benefit it provides is subject to a statutory limit.

Is a 401(k) a defined-benefit or defined-contribution plan?

The IRS describes a 401(k) plan as a defined contribution plan, in which contributions go into an individual account. A 412(e)(3) plan is a defined-benefit plan whose benefits equal the contract benefits at normal retirement age under section 412(e)(3)(C).

What makes a 412(i) plan a listed transaction?

Rev. Rul. 2004-20 identifies an arrangement as a listed transaction when it is the same as, or substantially similar to, the ruling's Situation 2, in which a plan holds life insurance on a participant above the participant's death benefit under the plan, and the employer has deducted amounts used to pay premiums on a contract whose death benefit exceeds the participant's death benefit under the plan by more than $100,000. Being fully insured does not, by itself, make a plan listed.

Did the 412(i) plan conditions carry over to section 412(e)(3)?

Yes. The IRS states that the former section 412(i) provisions were retained under PPA '06 and relocated to section 412(e)(3), which lists six conditions. The plan must be funded exclusively by insurance contracts, and the contracts must have level annual premiums from participation to retirement age. Plan benefits must equal the contract benefits at normal retirement age and be backed by a licensed insurance carrier, to the extent premiums have been paid. Premiums must be paid before lapse, or the policy reinstated. No security interest may exist at any time during the plan year, and no policy loans may be outstanding at any time during the plan year.

Can an employer deduct insurance premiums paid through a 412(i) or 412(e)(3) plan?

Section 264(a)(1) denies a deduction for premiums on a life insurance policy when the taxpayer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary under the policy or contract. In a 412(e)(3) plan, the employer's deduction is for contributions to the plan, and section 404 allows it only within that section's limits. Under Rev. Rul. 2004-20, contributions used to buy life insurance above the participant's death benefit under the plan are not fully deductible when contributed. How these rules apply depends on the plan's documents and contracts.

Does the regulation for 412(i) plans still use the old section number?

Yes. The IRS states that the regulations "remain in Treas. Reg. Section 1.412(i)-1" because they were not updated after PPA '06.

Educational information only. Not legal, tax, investment or insurance advice. Product availability and outcomes depend on individual circumstances.

Related Strategies

Compare Alternatives

Primary & Authoritative Sources

Remain Life Insurance Services, LLC